Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 6,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
In 2002, an attorney formerly employed by the Texas General Land Office (responsible for collecting and verifying royalty payments made to the State of Texas), told Ross, the lessor, that the Land Office had received a settlement payment from Shell based on underpayment of royalties on gas produced from the unit. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:03 pm
The United States, representing the interests of the Department of the Interior's Fish and Wildlife Service as amicus curiae, argues that § 9 is ambiguous, that the Appeals Court must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution....... [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
"* See The Constitution of the United States of America, U.S.G.P.O., Page 1035, Footnote 2.** Cooper v Aaron, 358 US 1, 18-19, [1958]. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:48 am
Easton Land & Dev., Inc., 723 F.2d 1549, 1551 (11th Cir.1984). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm
The Wilderness Society; Prairie Falcon Audubon, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:21 pm
In the more recent case of Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
People v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
Gant in conducting the search STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:17 pm
In that case, the Court held that the United States held "absolute fee simple" title to Hawaii's ceded lands, and that Congress' 1992 Apology Resolution had no legal effect. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
Villa Vicenza Homeowners Ass'n v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am
United States, 503 U.S. 540, 548-49, 112 S.Ct. 1535, 118 L.Ed.2d 174 (1992). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm
There is a separate case pending in the United States Federal court. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm
However, this right was only granted to the “grantors or successors in title” of surface land to the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:28 pm
However, this right was only granted to the “grantors or successors in title” of surface land to the United States. [read post]
