Search for: "MATTER OF D S N"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 5,780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
Gore & Assoc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court N D Ohio: False patent marking may not be false advertising: Rainworks Ltd v Mill-Rose Co (Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log) District Court S D New York: infringement of ‘essential’ patent in patent pool: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
The IJ denied asylum and the BIA affirmed that in Matter of J-B-N-, 24 I&N Dec. 208 (BIA 2007). [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(Ip's What's Up) Africa New US Trade Representative - Afro implications (Afro-IP) Argentina Official collective management organisation for film directors (IP tango) Asia An Asian perspective on the credit crunch (Managing Intellectual Property) Canada Scotch Whisky Association seeks leave to appeal FCA decision to the Supreme Court in trade mark battle over GLEN (Excess Copyright) China Third revision of… [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Cal. 1992), aff'd, 11 F.3d 865 (9th Cir. 1993); see generally 2 Loss & Seligman, supra, at 622 n.66. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
Les articles 14 et 88 du règlement (CE) n °6/2002 ... doivent être interprétés en ce sens que le titulaire du droit aux dessins et modèles créés dans le cadre d'un rapport contractuel autre qu'un rapport de travail subordonné, tels que les… [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 5:09 am
Super. 57, 626 A.2d 571, 574 n.3 (Pa. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:08 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
Shahid N. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 8:59 am
Of course, the fact of the matter will be that the child will continue as before to reside with the couple who applied for adoption. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
" Id. at 1969 n.8.Thus we'd say (we're defense counsel, right?) [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:46 am
Politics doesn't matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:55 am
Yet, to refuse even to consider the arguments made in the FDA's amicus brief or accord them any deference (id. at 24, n.13) seems unprecedented. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Worries about our patent system (The Invent Blog) US Patents Licensing Executives… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(Ars Technica) RIAA – Shahanda Moursy sues RIAA for fraud, abuse and legal sham (TorrentFreak) Tenenbaum, Joel – Defence team’s unorthodox tactics in illegal file-swapping case incurs judge’s displeasure (Ars Technica) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court New Hampshire: Domaining registrar defeats cybersquatting lawsuit: Philbrick v eNom, Inc (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (The Trademark Blog) District… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
TITLE Creating human rights : how noncitizens made sex persecution matter to the world / Lisa S. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:38 am
When it became apparent the State's evidence was not sufficient to support a felony charge, the district court called the matter to the State's attention. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:36 pm
N. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
– Address to Joint Session of Congress 24 Feb (Securing Innovation) (Securing Innovation) US Patents – Decisions Supreme Court rejects Federal Trade Commission’s bid to revive battle with Rambus (Law360) (ContentAgenda) (Hal Wegner) Supreme Court declines petition to review Singleton v Volkswagon regarding transfer of venue under 28 USC §1404(a) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Affidavit evidence to rebut KSR obviousness: Pivonka v… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:44 pm
He agreed that "if the Hawaii Supreme Court's opinion is read to construe the Apology Resolution as creating some affirmative duty or obligation as a matter of Federal law, we agree that that would be erroneous. [read post]
