Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2006, 7:48 pm
Demner, The Nuclear Terrorism Convention: Will Detainees Be Classified as "Enemy Combatants" by the United States Harvard Law Review, Volume 120, Number 1, November 2006 Neal Kumar Katyal, Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 2, 2011 Mr. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Rockwool Limited (Class 46) (IPKat) Copyright confusion (1709 Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform legislation moves to senate floor (Patent Docs) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inventive Step) How will the new House members handle patent reform? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Marking with expired patent sufficient for pleading intent: Simonian v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 6:45 am
" United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is the federal agency charged with overseeing livestock grazing on over 160 million acres of public land in the western United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:36 am
In this later proceeding, the Panel apparently ignorant of the earlier proceeding, in essence fell back on constructive knowledge: “Respondent either knew, or should have known, of Complainant’s SAVE THE CHILDREN mark when it registered the Domain Name insofar as, well before Respondent registered the Domain Name, the Mark had been in use (since 1939), the Mark was well-known in the United States and abroad. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Today, same-sex unions represent a tiny share of marriages in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:53 am
The registration resulting from such applications may be subject to cancellation if the mark is not in use in the United States with each and every good or service listed in the application. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:51 am
The other case, United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
INS: speech the state can’t regulate—how far are we from having no distinction b/t commercial and noncommercial speech? [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Israel Patent Office reduces fees (The IP Factor) New quality trade mark for the Areva region (The IP Factor) Israel trade mark portal launched (The IP Factor) New Israel Design Regulations (The IP Factor) Publications available over the internet now regarded as ‘publication in Israel’ for purpose of novelty requirement in designs (RelatIP) Japan Japan considers sound marks (Managing Intellectual Property) Kenya Contagious acts of… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am
Shortly after its passage, the Supreme Court held that the Amendment “is not a mere prohibition of State laws establishing or upholding slavery, but an absolute declaration that slavery or involuntary servitude shall not exist in any part of the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:13 am
Under the Marks rule established in Marks v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just been reportedly faced with a case of alleged nepotism on the part of one of its Commissioners, the outcome being reported by the Washington Times (here, with a katpat to Chris Torrero for the link). [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 3:23 am
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 17 March 2025, the Court dismissed an application for default judgement in the defamation and trade mark infringement claim of Hoser v Eleftheriou [2025] FedCFamC2G 392. [read post]
