Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 5301 - 5320 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2011, 7:20 am by Adam Wagner
Article 10 provides that in order for the state to interfere with freedom of expression rights, the interference must be (1) prescribed by law, (2) pursue a legitimate aim and (3) be necessary in a democratic society. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:18 am by Sophia Tang
  [1] Several Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court Concerning Judicial Services and Protection Provided by People’s Courts for the Belt and Road Initiative], [2015] Fa Fa No. 9, para 6; The Opinions of the SPC Regarding the People’s Court’s Further Provision of Judicial Services and Guarantees for the Construction of the Belt and Road, Fa Fa [2019] 29, para 24. [2] (2019) Hu 01 Xie Wai Ren No 22. [3] Singaporean case, Giant Light Metal Technology… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 9:24 am by Eugene Volokh
From Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Carl Aveni's decision in Bontell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 2:25 pm by Giles Peaker
  The costs of works that do have the effect of making good a structural defect are only recoverable if they fall within para (ii). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Rosalind English
We posted previously on  Grant and Gleaves v MOD , giving a summary of the claims and the circumstances of the claimants. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Jurisdiction also is available where conduct occurred outside the United States but which had a foreseeable substantial effect within the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:32 am by Mills & Mills LLP
Supporting the Armed Forces of a Foreign State The CRA has stated its position that it is not charitable to support the armed forces of a foreign state. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
The editor of The Sun has not offered an explanation such as is referred to in para 3 of the paragraph headed Public Interest. [read post]