Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 2:49 pm
(In re Tamoxifen Citrate Antitrust Litig.), 2006-2 Trade Cases ¶75,382. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:57 pm
(S.) v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 9:04 pm
The court rejected this reasoning, stating at para 50: “… the present case is not put in a different category by the fact that the Secretary of State is not seeking to subject Mr Tariq to a control order but is simply defending a discrimination claim. [read post]
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information: Part 1 The European Convention – Hugh Tomlinson QC
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm
In some cases this has been done by reference to Article 8 of the Convention (see Gaskin v United Kingdom (1989) 12 EHRR 36 paras 37, 52; see also McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1). [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:27 pm
Parker, 2000 BCSC 1605 at para. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
As this court explained in State v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:41 am
No. 97 v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm
”(para 3). [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:18 pm
Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 Ms Clue was a Jamaican national. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:18 pm
Birmingham City Council v Clue [2010] EWCA Civ 460 Ms Clue was a Jamaican national. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
As the court stated [para 63]: “What is required is that the Secretary of State act with ‘reasonable diligence and expedition’. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
"Arnold J however qualified question 3(b) as follows, at para. 20: "... [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
R (D and M) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; R (EM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 18 Read judgment With apologies, this post originally appeared with the wrong title The Court of Appeal has ruled on two linked challenges to the entitlement to welfare benefits of prisoners detained in psychiatric hospitals. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Brumley v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
” (McKennitt v Ash [2008] QB 73, para 11). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:01 pm
§ 112, ¶ 1. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:03 pm
Canadian Broadcasting Corp. [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835, R. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:44 am
Exh. 1) in Section 4, Para. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:25 am
Williamson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:29 am
Denny’s Corp., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,026. [read post]
