Search for: "Park v State"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 11,299
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2015, 10:00 pm
Bey v City of Tampa Code Enforcement, 2015 WL 1543646 (11th Cir. 4/8/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
3 May 2015, 8:00 pm
In McKinley v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 8:51 am
In the recent case of University of Texas at Arlington v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 11:13 pm
The Appellate Division reversed the conviction, relying on a 2000 decision, State v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:58 am
Such orders are named for a 1986 New Jersey case, Lore v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:32 am
In Pliego v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
Washington (Indian Gaming Compact - "Most-favored Tribe")* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlEagleman v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
The Court disagreed, citing SCOTUS’s Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
Indeed, in Capitol Square Review Bd. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 11:36 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
New London, Connecticut Mayor Daryl Finizio recently signed an agreement authorizing the construction of a “memorial park” on the former site of Susette Kelo’s “little pink house,” one of the fifteen residential properties condemned by the city as part in the famous Kelo v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Fure v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
In Luss v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 5:18 am
” Alack v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:29 am
During her deposition she she stated that on a road with no curbside parallel parking, the bike lane runs only to the gutter at the edge of the roadway. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:17 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 3:23 pm
That’s because of our Supreme Court’s (crazy) decision in Burd v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:27 pm
3 of Mustapha v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:25 am
A recent Illinois appellate case, People v Thomas, expressed reservations about this type of “setup” procedure, but the court felt bound by existing Illinois State Supreme Court law. [read post]
