Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 13,625
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 9:14 am
In Marlow v. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
Bielski, Case No. 22-105 (oral argument Mar. 21, 2023, in the Supreme Court of the United States). [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
Parliament had given the Ministers permission to deal with a future situation where patients became entrapped in medium-secure units as they had been in the State Hospital, and a discretion to go further, to deal with other kinds of unit, if it ever became desirable. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 1:18 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Kazarian v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:33 pm
Applying United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:30 am
ERISA preemption of severance agreements ARSENIO COLORADO, ET AL. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
United States, 470 U. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
United States scheduled for April 24, 2024. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
” In the Boston Review, Pam Karlan explains why the Court’s recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:44 am
United States, having to do with fish, Indian treaties, and culvert design, with Justice Kennedy recused.The Court took up no new cases for full argument and briefing. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for cell-site-location information. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
He is one of 51 Mexicans on death row in United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:18 pm
” Therefore, Viking petitioned the United States Supreme Court to review the case, arguing that Iskanian is preempted by federal law under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and the U.S. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm
United States, 10-8532, for Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:53 pm
The States recently filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:24 pm
Even if not, Article 3(a) would provide a clear statutory basis for jurisdiction, though United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 2:52 pm
Department of Agriculture (2013) 133 S.Ct. 2053, holding that California raisin handlers could maintain a takings claim as an affirmative defense to an enforcement action filed by the United States, and that the Hornes were not required to first file their claim in the Federal Court of Claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court has granted a petition to hear the controversial case of American Electric Power Company Inc., et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
(The Court in Hamdan indicated that the DTA's references to "the Constitution and laws of the United States" includes "the law of war," 126 S. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
