Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 28,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2020, 4:33 pm
In Little v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 1:32 pm
A consumer searching for e-cigarettes, when faced with a mark with a reputation for clothing and jewellery, will not make the required link necessary to succeed under Article 8(5) EUTMR because the goods are completely different.The decisionEarlier trade marks with a reputation in a Member State enjoy extended protection in accordance with Article 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
It was the first fan fiction case in China, in which the legal status of unlicensed fan work was tested in court.Here’s what Xi writes: Unconstraint state of mind (?) [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
In light of the repeal of §50-a, a request for disciplinary records relating to a police officer must be reviewed in the same manner as a request for disciplinary records of any other public employee. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
”; Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 12:00 am
In light of the repeal of §50-a, a request for disciplinary records relating to a police officer must be reviewed in the same manner as a request for disciplinary records of any other public employee. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
He urged them to consider dismissing the case in light of the political question doctrine. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:40 pm
First, Judge Reyna called into question the continued viability of the Blue & Gold waiver rule in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:24 pm
Our real-life case for today is Bradwell v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 1:44 pm
Mijangos v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 1:31 pm
"); United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
NIFLA v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:01 pm
The court found that the State was not prejudiced in the preparation of the defence because four months and five days is not an unreasonable delay in light of the above events and the claimant’s explanation was sufficient. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:29 am
Privacy Shield invalid in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am
John Lewis and writes that Lewis’ lifelong fight to protect voting rights continues in light of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
Steve also stated that consumer education (e.g. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:51 pm
In Russomano v. [read post]
