Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 5301 - 5320 of 13,675
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by Mark Graber
  Michael Klarman details how the death of segregation was hastened considerably by the backlash to Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Hayes and State Farm, November Term, 2010 No.: 03227 (C.P. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:43 am by Meg Martin
Both Sweet and the State recognized that in Pendleton v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:21 pm by Orin Kerr
Law.com has the story, via ATL, on the attempted cross-examination of Judge Easterbook by defense counsel Michael Orozco: The turning point came when Orozco challenged Easterbrook, 61, on the merits of the decision in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:20 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
The lawsuit is being brought by the Scharf-Norton Center for Constitutional Litigation at the Goldwater Institute on behalf of two state business corporations against Michael Sullivan, the director of the Office of Campaign and Political Finance (OCPF), which enforces the law. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:49 am
Seeking an ArrowArrow declarations can be granted: Fujifilm v AbbVieGuestKat Eibhlin Vardy discusses Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd v AbbVie Biotechnology Ltd & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 1, which involves two appeals, both raising the question of whether a Court can grant a so called ‘Arrow declaration’, i.e. a declaration that “a product was old or obvious in patent law terms at a particular date”.Guest Post - China's Patent BoomYangjin Li… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  On the menu was "Obviousness over the common general knowledge", followed by mulled wine and mince pies, all served up by chair Michael Hicks, the man behind the successful obviousness over CGK challenge way back when in Pozzoli SpA v BDMO SA & Others [2006] EWHC 1398 (Pat) (first instance) and [2007] EWCA Civ 588 (Court of Appeal). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Amy Howe
      In Halliburton v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:55 pm
The issue for copyright practice is whether pendent state-law claims for varieties of unfair competition will be pervasively preempted, as the logical consequence of analysis like that in Antidote v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Volokh Conspiracy (via How Appealing), Orin Kerr urges the court to review Van Buren v. [read post]