Search for: "State v. Save" Results 5301 - 5320 of 11,763
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 12:39 am by Ben
 The decision in in the 'Jersey Boys' case which has been covered by this blog here and here: Corbello v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 5:26 am
“TPPs had varying degrees of control over prescription benefits and various cost-saving measures available to them. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Div. 2015)           Following the recent opinion in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:26 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Include payment together with a form 1040-V (downloads as a pdf). [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am by John Jascob
The defendants sought to dismiss the Exchange Act claims under an interpretation of the Supreme Court’s Morrison decision that would require, for the U.S. securities laws to apply, that the plaintiff establish that the transaction occurred on a domestic exchange, that title to the security was transferred in the United States, or that irrevocable liability was incurred in the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
This saves costs for the generic manufacturer and, once the generic goes on the market, lowers prices for consumers. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by SHG
Among the few saving graces of the New York Court of Appeals was its stand-alone protection of constitutional rights. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Michael Froomkin
Murado also has an endorsement from SAVE, which is a big plus. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Instead, just include it loose, together with a completed form 1040-V (downloads as a pdf) in your envelope. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
  It also throws an important light on the issue of the structures for constraining the use of police power in states that may be useful, especially perhaps for those confronting similar issues in the United States (see, e.g., here and here). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]