Search for: "State v. Word" Results 5301 - 5320 of 40,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 6:18 pm
Blog reader Ryan Scott has called to my attention the decision by the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
Joel Seligman reviews Akhil Reed Amar’s The Words That Made Us in the Los Angeles Review of Books. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In Uniformed Fire Officers Association et al. v. de Blasio et al., Nos. 20-2789-cv, 20-3177-cv,  the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, addressed a number of issues arising after the repeal of §50-a of New York State's Civil Rights Law. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:09 am by Christine Corcos
Just how remarkable it was becomes apparent when it is contrasted with a decision of the United States Supreme Court just a year later, Adderly v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 2:37 pm
In Case C-228/03 Gillette Co v LA-Laboratories Ltd Oy, the CJEU stated that use that does not create an impression of commercial connection or take unfair advantage of the earlier mark’s distinctive character or repute will be considered honest practice. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:35 am by Eve Brensike Primus
The state court had properly noted that Davenport would be entitled to relief under Chapman v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 2:31 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Giorgio Luceri
Conceptually, although the Board admittedly stated that the word “Google” has no specific meaning as such, it added that the term is, however, generally associated with the intervener’s internet search engine. [read post]