Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 5301 - 5320 of 7,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm
KK/AD Leia mais: 27/12/2011 - Caso Patrícia Acioli: acusado pede transferência de presídio   [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:06 am by Corporate Action Network
To the scores of scholars, students, activists, business groups and journalists who have been monitoring, reporting, opining on the legal technicalities of the case Esther Kiobel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 4:27 am by Russ Bensing
Just how little wiggle room attorneys have in this area is indicated by the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday in Disciplinary v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm
Requer, ao final, seja reconhecida a prescrição da pretensão punitiva do Estado, pois entende que, em se tratando de documento particular, a pena máxima seria de três anos e, consequentemente, estaria extinta a punibilidade por terem se passado mais de oito anos entre a data dos fatos e o recebimento da denúncia. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v ASG Consulting Corp., 4 Misc 3d 1019(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 50967[U], * 6, * 8 [Sup Ct, Nassau County 2004]). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am by Bridget Crawford
The bill authorizes funding to train courts and police in assisting immigrant women who cooperate with law enforcement to receive T- and U-Visas. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R v Waya, heard 5 May 2011. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:08 pm by Donna Coker
The bill authorizes funding to train courts and police in assisting immigrant women who cooperate with law enforcement to receive T- and U-Visas. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm by WIMS
While this Court does not reach the question, it may be that by virtue of the State's sovereignty, neither laches nor estoppel could apply in a strict sense to bar the State's much belated claim. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
While this Court does not reach the question, it may be that by virtue of the State's sovereignty, neither laches nor estoppel could apply in a strict sense to bar the State's much belated claim. [read post]
Now they'll have to redo all those forms before the day of reckoning and that may include a Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney.Here's the opinion in a nutshell: Willfully making and subscribing a false tax return in violation of 26 U. [read post]