Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 13,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2017, 5:01 pm
The panel asked about United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 10:11 am
District Court for the Northern District of California (California v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:50 pm
The last time I recall this occurring was in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:50 pm
The last time I recall this occurring was in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
And that decision's from no schlub of a court: it's from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 8:48 am
In the recent case, San Joaquin County Correctional Officers Association v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 8:42 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm
Similarly, in the United States, a recent decision from the California Employment Development Department, found an Uber driver to be an employee for purposes of eligibility for unemployment law. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
At 4, he immigrated to the United States as a U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
Sprint Corporation, a Sprint Communications Company, L.P., et al., No. 2:14-cv- 02461-TLN-AC, pending before the Honorable Troy Nunley in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “Action”) Quintilone & Associates and a team of lawyer successfully reached a settlement of claims that Sprint violated various provisions of California’s wage and hour laws by, among other things, allegedly failing to: provide… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:56 pm
Henderson, of the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm
The court also agreed to take on another case involving the scope of jurisdiction over companies that do business throughout the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
United States and whether Section 16(b) is void for vagueness. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
By Little V. [read post]
