Search for: "United States v. Heard"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 8,393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
The trial in Thompson v James will be heard on 13 February 2013. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:25 am
In the two leading smartphone patent jurisdictions of the world, the United States and Germany, a number of final district court rulings are coming up for hearings at the appeals courts this year. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Koontz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a federal lawsuit by a former Internal Revenue Service employee who was fired after she insisted on wearing her kirpan in a Houston federal office building. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 12:02 pm
And he’s got chops: undergrad at Villanova, medical and doctoral degrees from Georgetown, residencies in the United States and abroad, and a postdoctoral fellowship at Stanford. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
On January 16, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Arlington v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
On January 16, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in City of Arlington v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:10 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:10 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:06 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:06 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:03 am
After the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided last week to deny Apple's motion for a rehearing en banc (full-bench review) of the Nexus ruling, some commentators suggested that this was the end of Apple's push for sales bans against Samsung and, looking beyond that dispute, all makers of Android-based, patent-infringing devices. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
(quoting Heard v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 8:44 pm
See Helton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
All right -- normally I do not engage laypersons who are ignorant of the law, but in this case (because so many people are being misled), I shall make an exception to that policy. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Maybe you’ve heard of it. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:02 am
Some attribute the amendment’s failure to the feminism backlash that began after the United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
The Supreme Court has recently heard arguments in the case of Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
