Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 5301 - 5320 of 10,422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2015, 5:04 pm by Amy Ross
Avakian also discussed the impact of the Second Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 12:26 pm by Ron Miller
The relationship between the state, the union, and the home health care providers Centeno v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 10:39 am by Ron Coleman
United States Watch Co., 173 Mass. 85, 53 N.E. 141 (1899). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 2:30 am
 Be that as it may, here's Tim's take on what Arnold J's decision has achieved, how they go about dealing with the same phenomenon in the United States -- and where we might go from here:Richemont v BskyB and others: a national solution to a global problem? [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:11 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Mark H Bonner (Ave Maria School of Law) has posted The Inquisition by Special Prosecutor in United States V. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:13 pm by Cooper Quintin and Eva Galperin
Related Issues: NSA SpyingSecurityState-Sponsored MalwareRelated Cases: EFF v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
This event will focus on the OHIM Community trade mark opposition decision in CANAL + v KABLEPLUS of 13 February 2014, where an opponent was put to proof of use of a mark which was not the basis of his opposition. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:00 am by Matt Danzer
After the ups and downs of this week’s hearings in the military commissions case of United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm by Andrew Frisch
Nevertheless, both the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concluded that the expert testimony was sufficient to establish that damages resulting from the “overbuilder” theory of injury were measurable on a classwide basis. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am by Joy Waltemath
“However, since Abood, the Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged that compelling a state employee to financially support a public sector union seriously impinges upon free speech and association interests protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution,” he argued, among other contentions. [read post]