Search for: "United States v. Was" Results 5301 - 5320 of 102,827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 6:04 pm
Unsurprisingly, and with a concise ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City cut short the reviews of an arbitral award the government of Laos sought to challenge in the matter Thai-Lao Lignite v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
United States (Alvarez Machain II), 266 F.3d 1045 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 1:49 pm
United States, No. 07-318; Chapman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm by Jim Chen
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
The case itself notes:Classen owns the following United States Patent Numbers: (1) 6,420,139 ("the 139 patent"); (2) 6,638,739 ("the 739 patent"); (3) 5,728,385 ("the 385 patent "); and (4) 5,723,283 ("the 283 patent") (collectively, "the patents in suit"). [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Shareholder Advisory Vote on Electioneering Contributions Whereas, the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:01 am by H. Scott Leviant
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 (Gentry) has been abrogated by recent United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 6:45 am
Via Scotusblog At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:15 am by Gene Quinn
As the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:00 am by Matthew Campbell
On June 8, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States in Allen v Milligan upheld the lower court’s determination that the newly adopted Alabama congressional maps likely violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 12:56 pm
Here's another group of summary orders of interest:In United States v. [read post]