Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 5301 - 5320 of 6,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
In the Curse of Bigness, Wu rejects the consumer-focused account of the Sherman Act articulated in Standard Oil v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Further, even after recreational marijuana was legalized in the state in 2016, a 2018 California Supreme court ruling in Ross v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 12:04 pm
Clinton is not fit for the presidency so voters should not support her. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
  They could accept the 13th amendment, but nothing past that.With 1896's Plessy v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:36 am by David Oscar Markus
In addition, some said Verrilli should have repeatedly focused attention on Court precedents like Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:32 am
Professor Koh argues that the "sole organ" doctrine has taken a drubbing, citing recent Supreme Court rulings.But I am not so sure.For one thing, even if the Supreme Court is eager for Congress to reassert its prerogatives, as Justice Breyer's Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The second time came a few minutes later when Clinton said: "The there [sic] are two big questions for voters in New Hampshire. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" asks @jdickerson http://j.mp/rcdxpt an interesting comparison: "Best Global Brands v Best Facebook Brands" http://j.mp/qJWlsn support @newmatilda: "NM Faces Closure In 2012" http://j.mp/qvlsFb a good piece on the battle between the afl and the nrl: "The gap narrows between the two big codes" http://j.mp/oyo6BF this is surprising: "Quick not-link: Australia’s biggest music funding body" http://j.mp/no256B #auspol this is fun:… [read post]