Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 5301 - 5320
of 6,768
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2011, 7:34 am
Compare Bowers v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am
In a world with little or no moving costs, foot voting for freedom would be even more common.To be sure, few of these foot voters are ideological libertarians. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
The number of votes cast is fairly low, which means that a rush of late voters can easily affect the current trend and indeed reverse it. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:42 am
The three cases are Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:48 am
” State v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:09 am
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 outlawed major forms of discrimination including racial segregation in public accommodations and inequality in voter registration applications. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:35 am
NLRB, 419 U.S. 301 (1974) and NLRB v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
The voters elected the other guy. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Brown (formerly Perry v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm
The City submitted a $3.3 million dollar revenue bond to fund the sewer project, which was approved by the voters. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:17 pm
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in the case Perry v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
Meanwhile, traffic (and voters) would snarl inexorably as more and more people drive on roads built for a less populous state. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:13 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).The Sixteenth Amendment, on income tax, abrogated Pollock v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:17 am
As a reminder, the cases involve the constitutionality of California’s Proposition 8 (officially Article I, Section 7.5) – a voter enacted amendment to the California constitution making marriage valid only between one man and one woman. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:36 am
And while Ian's proposal (a supermajority vote for non-retention) is an interesting one, it is susceptible to the argument levied against Article V--it makes popular constitutional change not only difficult, but virtually impossible. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
That ruling was in a 1997 case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:02 am
Of these, 49.58 per cent of voters (21.26 per cent of the electorate) supported the 25th Amendment and 50.42 per cent of voters (21.62 percent of the electorate) rejected it. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:35 pm
, Schmuck v. [read post]
