Search for: "Borders v. Borders" Results 5321 - 5340 of 6,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am by Marie Louise
(IP Dragon) DuPont learns that global IP theft doesn’t stop at the border (China Hearsay) Europe The chocolate menagerie: General Court decides on bunny, reindeer and mouse shapes: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v OHIM (jiplp) ECJ rules on legislative limitations on copyright protection for designs in Europe: Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (jiplp) AG delivers opinion in Viking Gas A/S v BP Gas A/S concerning trade mark law and… [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:23 am by Eric Goldman
* The Verge: The MPAA has a new plan to stop copyright violations at the border. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The claim borders on the absurd.One cannot evade liability by couching an otherwise defamatory statement of fact as an opinion. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia An Australian Border Force officer who believed she had been in a “loving relationship” with a colleague for almost two years is suing her former lover for defamation after discovering he had secretly accused her of being a sexual predator. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
On 28 November 2024 there was a hearing in the case of Titan Wealth v Okunola. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Mesa, 15-118, a/k/a, the cross-border shooting case, a/k/a Jesus v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:21 am by Andrew Delaney
I don't know about you, but this kind of light alone makes me nervousState v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:14 am by Old Fox
In fact, it borders on the sacrilegious. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
Conversely, the Artpusher case resulted in a ruling against the gallery, emphasizing that trademark law does not harbor a parody exception akin to that in copyright law, marking a clear boundary for artists and commercial entities alike regarding the use of trademarks in art, especially for commercial purposes.In the Jack Daniel's v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:57 am by Daphne Keller
They’re the ones asking the court to reach across borders and exercise its power. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]