Search for: "Defendants A-F"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 29,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
., 698 F.2d 831 (6th Cir. 1983), the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
Smith, 721 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 7:20 am
Grier, 475 F.3d 556 (3d Cir. 2007), which established the burden of proof for sentencing enhancements as a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 10:17 am
Nosal, 676 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc), the court held that the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:33 am
When defendants do it, it isn't called "forum shopping. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 3:41 pm
" Fultz, 146 F.3d at 1106. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 8:10 am
., 701 F.3d 796, 800 (5th Cir. 2012). [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
Gamber–Johnson LLC, 734 F. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
Kast, 921 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2019), that while Luvdarts was decided after Louis Vuitton, it did not “explicitly overrule it. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:52 am
The defendant was c [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:50 pm
The defendant was arrested and a stay away order was placed into effect. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:23 pm
Jul. 7, 2011), citing In re American Express Merchants’ Litigation, 634 F.3d 187 (2d Cir. 2011). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:08 am
Red F Marketing, LLC, 3:10CV228-FDW, 2013 WL 443698 (W.D.N.C. [read post]
District Court Judge Adopts Orders Approving Use of Predictive Coding, Denies Plaintiffs' Objections
26 Apr 2012, 1:54 pm
Carter, Jr. has denied the objections of Plaintiffs and upheld Magistrate Judge Peck’s orders approving Defendant’s use of predictive coding to review its own documents and adopting Defendant's proposed protocol.In this case, as has been discussed previously on this blog, Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck approved the use of predictive coding and largely adopted Defendant's then-proposed protocol over Plaintiffs’ objections. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 10:39 am
Ass’n, 494 F.3d 788, 807 (9th Cir. 2007)…” (STL post here).The case cite is ProteoTech, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:03 am
United States, 729 F.2d 935, 940 (8th Cir. 1984) (burden is on the government to justify warrantless search). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:13 pm
” Id. at 3 (citing In re Link_A_Media Devices Corp., 662 F.3d 1221, 1223 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 8:48 am
Johnson, 256 F.3d 895, 908 (9th Cir. 2001)], these forty minutes were not spent waiting for reinforcements. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
After all, no individual action would be allowed to proceed without the defendant knowing who was suing s/he/it. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 9:50 am
Pappas' new employer, S & F, whereby Aliki and Mr. [read post]
