Search for: "Doe v. Brown"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 5,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 am
The issues in the case, Perry v. [read post]
Divided court declines to reinstate Biden’s immigration guidelines, sets case for argument this fall
21 Jul 2022, 5:47 pm
The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Garland v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
Of course, Claridge’s does not just sell any old mineral water. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 pm
(And I think Karen's work on Flemming v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 5:55 am
” On this point, the majority opinion repeatedly referred to Zauderer v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 7:11 am
Listen to the Episode In this episode, Mr. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:44 am
{In Hess v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
See, e.g., Peterson v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:39 am
Justifying (but limiting) judicial review That we think of Bickel today as a proponent of judicial restraint is somewhat ironic, given that The Least Dangerous Branch was a defense of judicial action – specifically, the Court’s then-controversial decision to end racial segregation in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:16 am
[In the earlier Levitt v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:45 am
The agreement will initially be valid for ten years but does not allow for permanent U.S. bases, as existed before 1991. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
See NetCoalition v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 1:34 pm
” (Werner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 2:50 pm
Harper v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
As President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris took office one year ago this month, the ACLU published a civil rights and liberties wishlist for the new administration. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
The PR goes on to state that the FD&C Act definition of a device does not turn on where or by whom a test system is “manufactured. [read post]
