Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 15,479
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2019, 4:09 am
P. 8(a)(2), (d)(1). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
L. 833-886 (2017).23. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am
"Claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 was identical to claim 1 of the main request except for the addition of the wording "wherein parent plants used in the cross are sexually incompatible" at the end of the claim.Claim 1 of auxiliary request 2 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 3 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 4 read: [...]Claim 1 of auxiliary request 5 read: [...]Claim 1 of the five claims of auxiliary… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:25 pm
Filed: January 23, 2019Opinion by: Richard D. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:06 pm
Ware et. al., No. 1:11-cv-135, 2013 WL 6632436, at *1 (S.D. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:41 pm
On January 1, 2019, Dana Nessel took office. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 12:35 pm
For this last week: 1. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 10:28 am
Rate 1/1/19 >9.5 hrs/day or >55 hrs/week n/a 1/1/22 >9.5 hrs/day or >55 hrs/week n/a 1/1/20 >9 hrs/day Or >50 hrs/week n/a 1/1/23 >9 hrs/day or >50 hrs/week n/a 1/1/21 >8.5 hrs/day or >45 hrs/week n/a 1/1/24 >8.5 hrs/day or >45 hrs/week n/a 1/1/22 >8 hrs/day or >40 hrs/week >12 hrs/day 1/1/25 … [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:03 am
— 46 0.00% 0.00% 47 0.00% Pa. 6.00% 16 0.34% 6.34% 34 2.00% R.I. 7.00% 2 0.00% 7.00% 23 0.00% S.C. 6.00% 16 1.43% 7.43% 17 3.00% S.D. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 6:18 pm
Filed: February 23, 2018Opinion by: Ellen Lipton HollanderFacts: Payments IP Pty Ltd. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 7:42 am
Figure 1. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
It is also clear that RKA was being paid for ongoing work, excluding the separately negotiated FFE Agreement, pursuant to a series of Change Orders purporting to contain add-ons to the basic services fee described in Section 1 of Schedule C…..Accordingly, the essential facts supporting a breach of contract under RKA’s interpretation of the Service Agreement were probably known as early as March 23, 2009. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
BACKGROUNDThe facts recited in this opinion are the court's findings based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at a one-day trial held on October 1, 2018. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
Dumrauf, No. 1:2017cvo6648 (N.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review, heard 23 Oct 2018. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
It is also clear that RKA was being paid for ongoing work, excluding the separately negotiated FFE Agreement, pursuant to a series of Change Orders purporting to contain add-ons to the basic services fee described in Section 1 of Schedule C…..Accordingly, the essential facts supporting a breach of contract under RKA’s interpretation of the Service Agreement were probably known as early as March 23, 2009. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:00 pm
By using a separate will for the closely held companies, there may be significant savings if the will does not need to be probated.The Application Judge’s decision and reasoning is succinctly summarized by Associate Chief Justice Marrocco:[1] John Douglas Milne and Sheilah Marlyn Milne died on the same day. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Connecticut: $97 Million of Influence: Lobbyists are fixtures at the Capitol, pushing their message amid rules on gifts, perks, receptionsHartford Courant – Josh Kovner | Published: 1/23/2019 Every January at the Connecticut Capitol, the lobbying effort revs up to a fever pitch and does not stop until the final roll call. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
Yesterday (January 23, 2019), the EPO's Opposition Division scheduled a hearing in those two parallel proceedings for November 28, 2019, and tue summons to the hearing came with an annex: a preliminary opinion according to which those patents are invalid.Here's one of the two near-identical opinions, and here's a link to the other (this post continues below the document with an explanation of the EPO's findings and a summary of Qualcomm's poor results in… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Background First Instance The case involves a 23 December 2012 Facebook posting by Ms Stocker relating to her former husband, in which Ms Stocker alleged that Mr Stocker had “tried to strangle me”. [read post]
