Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that Part I of the Indian Act is excluded in cases (ii), (iii) (Dosco v Doozan; Hardy Oil) and (perhaps) (iv) (Videocon v Union of India); and that it is not excluded in case (i) (Indtel Technical Services; Citation Infowares v Equinox). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
However, today's decision in Case T-526/09 PAKI Logistics GmbH v OHIM; soutenu par Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d’Irlande du Nord -- available only in French and German so far -- has drummed up a lot of activity in the general vicinity of the Kat's email in-box, spearheaded by the articulate and erudite Simon Malynicz (3 New Square) who appeared for the Royaume-Uni [Merpel explains: the United Kingdom has been rebranded 'Royaume-Uni' in a desperate… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
e, nezlob se” (translated as "Don’t get angry, man", but known to many English readers as ludo). [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Vance v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:52 am
This case (Case C-442/10, Churchill Insurance Company Limited v Benjamin and Tracy Evans v Equity Claims Limited) which arose out of two references to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) made in separate cases before the English courts, concerned an issue unique to the system of vehicle insurance in the UK. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
Salmond and MacAskill were roundly condemned for their remarks, being accused of anti-Englishness and, more seriously, of threatening judicial independence and undermining the rule of law. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:37 pm
Myoung Ung Lee, a UW LL.M. candidate in Asian Law and former UW Visiting Scholar, gave a fascinating lecture titled Comparing Judicial Review: U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:37 pm
Myoung Ung Lee, a UW LL.M. candidate in Asian Law and former UW Visiting Scholar, gave a fascinating lecture titled Comparing Judicial Review: U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm
A version of that right is entrenched in the constitutional law of the United States: the right of every human being – again, without exception – not to be subjected to any punishment that is “cruel and unusual”. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:12 am
But Austen was not the only English novelist to use the issue of entail as a plot device. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
In Filarsky v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am
W -v- M and S and A NHS Primary Care Trust [COP 1182483] Court of protection: Not in woman in vegetative state’s best interests to remove artificial nutrition and hydration. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 5:08 pm
I'll spare you the gory details, here and give you SCOTUSBlog's "plain English" description of the issue: "Does the First Amendment give state employees the right to decline to pay union dues used for political advocacy by the union? [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 12:59 pm
Court of Appeal recently held in Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 12:22 pm
Court of Appeal recently held in Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
