Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 68,513
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 9:56 am
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of Oklahoma [official website] on Monday ruled [opinion] that granting "personhood" rights to human embryos is unconstitutional, thus derailing a proposed ballot initiative [text, PDF] to amend the state's constitution by defining a fertilized egg as a person. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:27 am
V. [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:32 am
And in North Carolina v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a decision of the district court that granted summary judgment to Lotte International America Corp. because Ezaki Glico’s cookie design was functional and not entitled to trade dress protection in Kaisha v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
In Maples v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 6:44 am
And in Doe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:06 am
Federal Courts Do Not Have Appellate Jurisdiction Over State Court Judgments Despite the broad grants to federal courts of jurisdiction over section 1983 claims by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2005, 11:41 am
In DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:25 am
Enbridge Energy Co. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: AC34959 - Anderson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 7:25 am
Scott Gesner reports that he got an acquittal this week in State v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:10 am
President of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
And in Guerrant v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
The appeal, Watson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
TaxProf Blog Op-Ed: Moore Decides Less, by Andy Grewal (Iowa; Google Scholar): When the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Moore v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Wells Fargo Home Mortg. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 5:36 pm
On Tuesday, CAAF granted review and ordered briefing in an Army case:WHETHER APPELLANT'S PLEAS TO ALL CHARGES AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDENT BECAUSE THE MILITARY JUDGE DID NOT EXPLAIN THE DEFENSE OF LACK OF MENTAL RESPONSIBILITY TO APPELLANT, DID NOT SATISFY HERSELF THAT COUNSEL HAD EVALUATED THE VIABILITY OF THE DEFENSE, AND DID NOT ELICIT FACTS FROM APPELLANT THAT NEGATED THE DEFENSE.United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:01 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday granted certiorari [order list, PDF] in MBZ v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 5:09 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:44 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] granted certiorari [order list, PDF] Monday in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
