Search for: "High v State"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 35,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 4:49 pm
… Link to: Part I Part II Part IV Part V [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:52 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:02 pm
While the state high court did require the expert witness in that case to be qualified, it did not set any sort of precedent indicating an expert was required to prove such a case. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:02 am
” CTS Corp. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
West v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 9:05 pm
Takings alert [Ilya Shapiro, David McDonald on Cato certiorari petition in case of 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:00 am
Maryland's high state court threw out the conviction on the grounds that Kelly's inability to call two witnesses after the judge ruled (without a state objection) that their testimony was inadmissible hearsay violated Kelly's rights. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
via Daniel Schwartz] Tags: ADA filing mills, disabled rights, football, Maryland, nursing homes, obesity Disabled rights roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:58 am
The case cite is Corsair Memory, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:51 pm
While public safety certainly calls for the incapacitation of some, there is another side to the equation, which, after United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 2:35 am
Their claim was dismissed at first instance by the High Court. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm
There is also guidance from the way the Constitution was ratified: By conventions in each state, elected by the people, but composed of a high proportion of lawyers, who also dominated the debates. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
There's simply no reason at all to think that the 2017 Congress believed that anyone (no reasonable person, anyway) would purchase unwanted insurance because of a "sense of legal obligation" engendered by the 2017 statutory amendment.But even if there were some such unreasonable people out there (such as, perhaps, the individual plaintiffs in the case) who mistakenly read the amended Section 5000A to require them to purchase insurance, those people--like the… [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
City of Miami and Wells Fargo v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:30 am
Now in Harper v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm
Sometimes in drug treatment, you start a patient off with a high ‘loading dose’ to get the blood-levels up to an operational state. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:42 pm
Party Ltd. v. [read post]
