Search for: "Husband v. Wife"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 6,703
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 3:17 pm
In Levine v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
At a holiday party, this in-house lawyer’s wife complained that the GC was keeping her husband at work until 8 or 9 every night. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:34 am
In joint cases filed under section 302 of this title and individual cases filed under section 301 or 303 of this title by or against debtors who are husband and wife, and whose estates are ordered to be jointly administered under Rule 1015(b) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, one debtor may not elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (2) and the other debtor elect to exempt property listed in paragraph (3) of this subsection. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:26 am
During the course of the relationship, the de facto husband had made home payments, and the de facto wife had paid for groceries. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 10:15 am
Not in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 6:17 am
The emergency could be that their Husband/Wife is taking the furniture, going to turn off the electricity, or cancel the Husband's/Wife's car insurance. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
In Shippen v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
The husband and wife cited several cases holding that plaintiffs who were neither competitors nor consumers in the relevant market nonetheless had antitrust standing because their injuries were “inextricably intertwined” with alleged antitrust violations. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:10 am
Today’s Court of Appeals opinion in Susan R. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:58 am
Belcher v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
In Frier v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:31 am
Lichtenstein v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:53 am
In doing so it provided the following analysis on credibility: …Wife took Daughter, who was fourteen years old at the time, with no objection by Husband, and Husband agreed to Wife having sole custody. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:25 am
In some cases, more than six-figures.One such case decided during that era by Oakland County Family Court Judge Elizabeth Pezzetti, Skinner v Skinner, was upheld earlier this month in an opinion by the Michigan Court of Appeals. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:56 am
Smith [said] she would be more comfortable if her husband were present. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:58 pm
Notably, the wife was awarded an amount far less than what husband had originally been paying. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:10 pm
Not in the case of Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 am
Justice Goodman quotes Peo. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:52 pm
Thus, if a husband is sentenced to probation, presumably the court could insist that his wife, with whom the husband lived, couldn’t keep guns at home, even in a locked case to which only she had access. [read post]
