Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 5321 - 5340
of 18,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Earlier this month, Justice Emerson’s post-trial decision in Bonanni v Horizons Investors Corp., 2016 NY Slip Op 50281(U) [Sup Ct Suffolk County Mar. 9, 2016], found in Bonanni’s favor on most of his claims, including a determination that the defendants unlawfully converted his 20% membership interest by pretending he had withdrawn from the LLC. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: Now that Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm
If we were to conclude that the Rule is part of domestic law, it would not technically bind the government, but it would make it difficult for the government to re-open the question in this country, and it could make it more difficult for the government to challenge the conclusion and reasoning in MGN v UK in Strasbourg. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 3:39 pm
Backstrom, and James V. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Assume that in California v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm
In R. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 10:28 am
Remember Suleiman v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:01 am
This is not surprising after Baze v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:41 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
Arrest New York Civil Law: Appellate Division, Third Department Applies Arons v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
Justice Stevens also had harsh words for the 5-to-4 decision in 1987 in McCleskey v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
" Knox v. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 7:06 am
Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
He was acquitted at a re-trial. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:46 pm
This edition of "Petitions to Watch" features cases up for consideration at the Justices' private conference tomorrow, November 6. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:36 pm
But I always tell my students that this can be a fatal flaw once you're an attorney. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 4:26 pm
Second, merely saying that you no longer have to make express findings about something similarly doesn't mean that you're no longer able to consider it. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 4:06 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
