Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 7,891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
Resolution VI provided (I divide it into three parts for convenience): [1] "That the national Legislature ought to possess the legislative rights vested in Congress by the confederation;" [2] "and moreover to legislate in all cases for the general interests of the Union;" [3] "and also in those to which the States are separately incompetent, or in which the harmony of the United States may be interrupted by the exercise of individual legislation. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
John D. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 11:47 am
As mitigating factors, the Panel considered (1) Respondent's lack of a prior disciplinary record; (2) Respondent's admission of guilt and cooperation; (3) Respondent's remorse for his conduct, which the Panel found to be genuine; and (4) Respondent's good character and reputation. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
John A. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:57 am
”) (2) What does “philosophically unfounded” mean? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:24 pm
.'" Ex Parte Frye, Appeal 2009-006013, 2010 WL 889747 *3-4 (BPAI Feb. 26, 2010) (Precedential). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
It was also subject to a lengthy critique by Ed Whelan on NRO’s Bench Memos in five parts: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:28 am
2. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Chief Justice John Roberts asks about precedent. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 6:56 am
They would also get: Raises: Sept. 1, 25 cents an hour. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
Leverage non-lawyer professionals: the firm has more than 500 paralegals, putting the ratio to lawyers at more than 2:1. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:42 pm
In Shankman, the respondent, a partner in a firm, was found guilty of, among many other rule violations, violating rule 4-8.4(c) for (1) failing to disclose to the firm and keeping for himself a bonus from a client, over and above the reduced fee that he caused the firm to accept in the case; (2) failing to inform the firm of an unemployment benefits clients potential whistle blower action, directing that the clients case be closed out, and proceeding to represent the client and… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:51 am
This is a question the Court of Appeal considered in its recent judgment in James Butler v John Smith. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:30 pm
A has killed B purposely.2. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
"When faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either disclose the record sought, deny the request and claim a specific exemption to disclosure, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search (see Public Officers Law § 87 [2]; § 89 [3]; Corvetti v Town of Lake Pleasant, 239 AD2d 841, 843 [3d Dept 1997])" (Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr., 5 NY3d at 440-441). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
"When faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either disclose the record sought, deny the request and claim a specific exemption to disclosure, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search (see Public Officers Law § 87 [2]; § 89 [3]; Matter of Corvetti v Town of Lake Pleasant, 239 AD2d 841, 843 [3d Dept 1997])" (Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr., 5 NY3d at… [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 12:30 am
John the Evangelist Blackpool [2022] ECC Bla 2 This was an unopposed petition determined on the papers and without a hearing. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966). [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
*2. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
I identified the driver using his/her California Driver’s License as John Doe 00-00-00. [read post]
