Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3" Results 5321 - 5340 of 7,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 8:13 pm by Lawrence Solum
” Thus, you would consider the costs of your decision, such as: (1) your friend will be hurt, (2) you will miss out on the satisfaction of having lunch with your friend, and (3) your friend may not trust your promises in the future if you break this promise. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 12:08 pm by FDABlog HPM
  The FDC Act does not make a distinction between intentional and unintentional adulteration, but rather prohibits the introduction of adulterated food, drugs, and medical devices into interstate commerce. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:20 am by SHG
The responses are always the same: 1) The video doesn't tell the entire story, 2) We don't understand the "adrenaline" that causes police officers to beat the living crap out of suspects after they are securely in custody, and 3) So what, the guy's a criminal anyway.We as criminal defense lawyers, civil libertarians, and yes, even some prosecutors and judges, watch these videos and know that there is a large segment of the country that finds this… [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:00 am by Nedy Warren
Four ways that a company can show the employee he or she matters is by (1) taking prompt action; (2) having a neutral party conduct the investigation; (3) ensuring confidentiality; and (4) communicating the results of the investigation. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:13 am by Walter Olson
Tags: law schools, Schools for Misrule Related posts WSJ: John McGinnis reviews Schools for Misrule (2) Washington Times review; Yale Daily News (1) Supplying a missing footnote (0) Schools for Misrule: some early blog reactions (2) Schools for Misrule roundup: Chronicle of Higher Ed, NBN podcast (0) [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:17 am by Legal Beagle
" The report does not present any information about the religious beliefs or affiliations of the people targeted by the offensive conduct. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:49 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In arguing that the policy precluded coverage for the settlement, the insurer relied on Policy Section V (illegal profit/payment exclusion):   The Insurer shall not be liable to make any payment for Loss, other than Defense Costs, in connection with any Claim arising out of or in any way involving: 1. any Insured gaining, in fact, any profit, remuneration, or financial advantage to which the Insured was not legally entitled; 2. payment by the Company of inadequate or… [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 11:50 am by Peter Tillers
I believe in a triad: (1) Theory 1 (legal theory); (2) Theory 2 (other theory -- e.g., probability, neuroscience, physics, information theory); and (3) Practice (private law practice; drafting legislation; etc.) ... [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:25 pm by WSLL
CiteID=464853Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, The Honorable John G. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am by Lawrence Douglas
Before the NMT, by contrast, crimes against humanity emerge as the principal crime in the Medical trial (No. 1), the RuSHA case (No. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:52 pm by Andrew Berger
I begin with your publishing contract and will focus on 8 key provisions in that agreement. 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:43 pm by Shahram Miri
Yes, a trustee can be removed (1) in accordance with the trust instrument (2) by the court on its own motion, or  (3) on petition of a settlor, cotrustee, or beneficiary under Probate Code Section 17200. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am by Terry Hart
1 Only two years later, Supreme Court Justice Thompson said in his dissent to the seminal opinion in Wheaton v. [read post]