Search for: "Kat" Results 5321 - 5340 of 6,626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 5:11 am by Staci Zaretsky
During the summer of 2010, law bloggers ranging from The Careerist’s Viva Chen, to Corporette’s Kat Griffin, to Above the Law’s David Lat, all weighed in on the appropriateness of peep-toe pumps for women lawyers. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:28 am by war
No doubt, you will have your own favourite recommendation(s), but (as I am not a Kat, ip or otherwise) that is all there is time for today! [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:25 am
The Kats refrain from making any comment, knowing that others do these things so much better, but something has occurred to them: Geneva must be crammed to the rafters with publicly funded conference halls and meeting facilities. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:21 am
For this Kat, however, exam scripts are calling – once more unto the breach… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:23 am
This Kat will be interested to read the Bundesgerichtshof's decision in its entirety once it becomes available, as well as the Kammergericht Berlin's actual decision in this particular case. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:01 pm
The Kat marvels at the diligence of his IPO friends. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 am
 Adidas will be an official sponsor of Fifa World Cup 2014 in Brazil [an event which seems to have been eclipsed by recent news, and which does not, to this Kat's recollection, seem to have attracted any accusations]. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:50 pm
 IP, particularly pre-commercialised, does not need to be restrictive to be effective [This is the problem, says the Kat: we all know what 'restrictive' means, but 'effective' carries no single shared meaning -- and we're talking about the conflicting interests here]. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:00 am
It also has the honour of being the first book this Kat owns which comes with its own commemorative book box. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA (jiplp) PCC Page 28: Stretching tentacles – having designs on costs: Cautious Co and IPOff Ltd (PatLit) Court tells Kats, tail must not wag dog: EWCA (Civ) decision in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:55 pm
The Kat glazes over with all these details to understan But what of the ruling itself? [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:28 am
So why are UK websites not asking this Kat for 'permission to cookie'? [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:38 am
Several of my fellow Kats managed to do a better job than I in juggling the recent INTA meeting in San Francisco with other tasks, as evidenced by my recent silence. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:56 pm
n 40. maddesinde, "Hüküm kat'iyet kesbetmeden vukubulan mevkufiyet ceza mahkûmiyetlerinden indirilir …" ve buna ko? [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:32 am
The Kat suspects that there are plenty more examples out there, and has no doubt that he will be hearing from readers on this topic. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:37 am
".Readers are invited to inspect the list of goods and services and share their thoughts with the various Kats. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:31 pm
[The Kat remains totally baffled as to what the fact that OHIM delivers trade marks has to do with the war against infringements. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:53 am
Policy does not address Privacy and Proxy Registrations or require complaining party to amend complaint once infringing party identified.No explanation on what a registrar should do when a UDRP decision conflicts with an injunctive order issued by a of local jurisdiction.It should be possible to implement these rather technical issues without breaking the system, this Kat thinks. [read post]