Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 5321 - 5340 of 8,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Loked and loaded: are bag closures famous to the general consuming public?
13 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Packaging trade dress needs specific design, not just color, to be inherently distinctive
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
College. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
The Constitution Writ Large, Part Two
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Texas to U.S. v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
General Global Week in Review 7 Dec 09 from IP Think Tank
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
- Bundesgerichtshof gives guidance on indirect confusion, manufacturer’s brands and private labels: Garlic Sausage (Class 99)   India Amendment of patent claims under section 58 (Spicy IP) India: Challenging pre-grant orders through writs: Whither ‘alternative remedies’? [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
No safe harbour for PORT CHARLOTTE trade mark registration, as GI storm brews
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
 IVDP then appealed to the General Court on several grounds.The decisionIn Case T‑659/14 IVDP v OHIM (PORT CHARLOTTE) General Court held:“…it is clear that neither the provisions of Regulation No 491/2009, nor those of Regulation No 207/2009, state that the protection under the former must be construed as being exhaustive in the sense that that protection cannot be supplemented, beyond its particular scope, by another system of protection. [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Another court is allergic to In re GNC's flawed reasoning on falsity
20 Aug 2018, 5:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hobbs v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
N.D. Ga. Daubert Analysis Excludes Plaintiff's Expert and Ends SJS/TEN Case
12 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
So the label was flat-out adequate. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Blowing Smoke About Impacts? Fourth District Rejects Speculative CEQA Challenge to San Diego’s Medical Marijuana Consumer Cooperative Ordinance, Holds Zoning Ordinances Are Not Necessarily CEQA “Projects”
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Litigating Testosterone Replacement Hormone Injury Lawsuits
27 Jan 2018, 6:32 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Guilbeau v. [read post]
Product Liability Lawyer Blog - http://www.productliabilitylawyerblog.com/
Will The ACLU Make “Dr. DRE” A Precedent In Georgia?
7 Oct 2017, 3:53 am by SHG
And in State v. [read post]
Simple Justice - http://blog.simplejustice.us
(Medical) food for thought: latest in Lanham Act/FDCA intersection
10 Sep 2007, 6:01 am
Midlothian Laboratories, L.L.C. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Answer unclear in Clearly beverage infringement case
8 May 2015, 9:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Clearly Food & Beverage Co. v. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Online Global Week in Review 14 January 2011 from IP Think Tank
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am by Kelly
Kevin Starr (ArsTechnica) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liberty Media Holdings – Biggest ever BitTorrent piracy settlement is intriguing (TorrentFreak) Pink Visual – Porn company rejects mass lawsuits, goes after torrent sites (TorrentFreak) Sony – Sony sues over Playstation 3 security hack (IP Osgoode) US Copyright Group – Forget Hurt Locker; P2P lawyers lower sights to Massive Asses 5 (ArsTechnica) Viacom – The Viacom appeal: Viacom v… [read post]
IP Thinktank - http://duncanbucknell.com/ipthinktank.blog
California Supreme Courts Limits Governmental Immunity Statute That California Courts of Appeal Had Read More Broadly
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm by Kendall Lowery
State of California (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 182. [read post]
Renne Public Law Group News - https://rennepubliclawgroup.com/news/
California Supreme Court Limits Governmental Immunity Statute That California Courts of Appeal Had Read More Broadly
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm by Kendall Lowery
State of California (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 182. [read post]
Renne Public Law Group News - https://rennepubliclawgroup.com/news/
Deconstructing the Duty to Test
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
Owens Illinois, Inc., 799 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1986); LaBelle v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
[Orin Kerr] Reconciling Katz and the Fourth Amendment Text
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am by Orin Kerr
From that perspective Katz was something like United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Hey, Jude! Making It Good on Preemption
11 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
  See Pinsonneault v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Guest Post by Stephen Carlisle: ASCAP and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad DOJ Decision That’s Going to Create Chaos in the Music Industry
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by Chris Castle
You just suggested what the plain text of the consent decree states unequivocally is prohibited conduct! [read post]
Music - Technology - Policy - http://www.musictechpolicy.com/
More New Stuff
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  Id.To get around TwIqbal, the plaintiffs in Ali trotted out Hofts v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/