Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 5321 - 5340 of 42,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 8:30 am by DONALD SCARINCI
§ 2241(c); and (2) whether, before a court grants an order allowing a habeas petitioner to develop new evidence, it must determine whether the evidence could aid the petitioner in proving his entitlement to habeas relief, and whether the evidence may permissibly be considered by a habeas court. [read post]
17 May 2022, 1:28 am by INFORRM
The situation more complicated in Family cases, which have their own set of rules, and because many cases are heard in private. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:50 pm by William Jaksa
If the court has no confidence on the accused the quality of the sureties and the best supervision plan won’t matter. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Gurbir Grewal
When experienced counsel, who are well aware that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in our investigative testimony, repeatedly interrupt testimony to lodge hearsay or other inapplicable objections, trust can be eroded. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
A constitution, by its nature, places certain matters beyond the realm of public opinion as filtered through the day-to-day political process. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:51 am by privacylawyer
Before I wrap up, it should be noted that the rules are different if it is the business itself reporting a crime. [read post]
16 May 2022, 8:17 am by Michael Stern
The purpose of the hearing before the committee would be to rule on any objections filed and to consider recommendations to the House for further action. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
Comments On 31 December 2021, shortly before this ruling, the SPC issued a memorandum on commercial and maritime matters entitled “Memorandum of the National Courts’ Symposium on Trials for Commercial and Maritime Cases” (hereinafter “Memorandum”). [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:09 am by John Jascob
“When experienced counsel, who are well aware that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply in our investigative testimony, repeatedly interrupt testimony to lodge hearsay or other inapplicable objections, trust can be eroded,” said Grewal.In the case of SEC staff, Grewal said “[i]n short, we will not play games during our investigations, negotiations, or litigations. [read post]
16 May 2022, 1:50 am by Frank Cranmer
However, no equivalent provisions to the rules concerning teachers’ rights not to teach religious education or attend worship are included here. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
| Critics argue that the Trump Administration’s rule to protect suburbs will negatively impact fair housing. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 12 May 2022, a ruling on serious harm and defamatory meaning was handed down in Wilks v Qu [2022] VCC 620. [read post]
15 May 2022, 3:11 pm by Roy M. Doppelt
There are exceptions to the general rule, though, as demonstrated in a recent California ruling issued in a divorce matter. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:05 am by ArborYpsi Law
As neither the evidence of record nor the prosecution rebutted the presumption, the court found that a reversal of the intermediate court’s ruling was warranted, and it remanded the matter for a new trial. [read post]
15 May 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
When a judge rules against you during your Illinois divorce, that ruling may or may not be significant enough to bring that ruling before an appeals court for review. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:25 pm by Jon Katz
Although jurors decide on such matters of fact as credibilty of witnesses, judges decide all matters of law, including ruling on defense motions to suppress / exclude evidence from an allegedly unlawful traffic stop, search or arrest, and from allegedly unlawful questioning of the criminal defendant; and ruling on the admissiblity of evidence, including certificates of analysis of breath and blood testing for alcohol concentration. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
But Louisiana law had never been revised to comply with the First Amendment rules set forth starting with New York Times v. [read post]