Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 5,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2009, 3:08 am
Examining Attorney Amy C. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:59 am
What events marked the end of the credit crisis? [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
Consider the saga of Geoffrey Feiger (latest installment, with summary, here) or the disciplinary proceedings against Mark Gardner (here). [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 2:54 am
" Examining David C. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
The document upon which American relied was a 2008 sales presentation that contained rote talking points about how good the company was or what ends it sought to achieve (which, presumably, someone in sales would want known to others).The last point is, in my opinion, most important because the theory of inevitable disclosure as applied to salesmen is considerably more abstruse. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
The other day, I did a quick post in a pique of anger at the US criticizing China's Human Rights record while Barack Obama was travelling in or to Saudia Arabia and Egypt. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:47 am
Following a new appeal to The Court of First Instance, which repealed the decision of the Appellate Court with the following arguments: 33 Furthermore, with regard to the conditions for revocation laid down by Article 12(2)(b) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1), whose normative content is, in essence, the same as that of Article 50(1)(c) of Regulation No 40/94, the… [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
The problem with the analogy is that Jon Lieber's perfect game was broken up by a hit from Mark McGwire that eventually landed outside the field for a home run. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:25 pm
Sex Offender Issues (C) 2006-2009, All Rights Reserved! [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:52 pm
And I mean obsession in a good way. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:20 pm
To some extent, there is also the Geoff Moore core-and-context argument made so effectively in the Legal space by Cisco GC Mark Chandler. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
Most Twitterers use actual English words, not SMS abbreviations like "c u l8er. [read post]
31 May 2009, 3:16 am
Even if the trade mark did contain a sign that is a geographical indication for the purposes of the Act, Bavaria NV would succeed in raising the defence under s 61(2)(c) of the Act. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:17 am
by Dale C. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:34 am
In this case, the Civil Service Board found itself in the unfortunate position of having no good alternatives. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
US Trademarks USTrademarkExchange.com: New web service for sale of registered trade marks (IP finance) Think outside the trademark box – staying on top of recent developments in other areas of IP law can help trade mark owners be more strategic in trying cases (Managing Intellectual Property) US Trade Marks – Decisions Court of Appeal for District of Columbia affirms laches ruling dismissing REDSKINS cancellation: Pro-Football v… [read post]
24 May 2009, 2:06 pm
Deontology: An action is right if and only if the action is either (a) required by a moral duty, or (b) allowed by a moral permission, and not (c) forbidden by a moral prohibition. [read post]
24 May 2009, 8:54 am
In RG 07/11365 L'Oréal SA c eBay France SA in which the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris dismissed trade mark infringement claims by L'Oréal against eBay for providing an on-line market for counterfeit goods on 13 May 2009. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:08 am
(EDTexweblog.com) BPAI precedential opinion on rejecting software means claims; website ‘means’ requires algorithm disclosure: Ex parte Catlin (Patently-O) (I/P Updates) US Copyright Newpapers betray their heritage with internet attacks (Public Knowledge) News aggregators as ‘tapeworms’ (Excess Copyright) Copyright infringement on the internet: Problem is no longer confined to entertainment industry (Silicon Valley IP Licensing Law Blog) Public… [read post]
17 May 2009, 2:23 am
The CTM was registered in 1999, but in 2003 Fiorucci applied to have the mark invalidated under Art.51(1)(c) and Art.52(2) CTMR. [read post]
