Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 70,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 8:51 am
Thus, an essential element of a tortious interference claim could not be met.The court also declined to accept Mark III’s invitation to recognize a claim for Sysco’s alleged “participating and assisting” BI’s breach of fiduciary duty.From Mark III’s perspective, this case illustrates the importance of proper documentation of a business deal so that, if the deal falls through, the damaged party enjoys… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
As previously referenced in eDiscovery Daily, defendant Mark Pappas, President of Creative Pipe, Inc., was ordered by Magistrate Judge Paul W. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 1:45 am
“It was 40 years ago that the bill was passed marking the end of back-street abortions and the beginning of women’s right to choose whether or not to terminate an unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
5 Sep 2006, 2:17 pm
Dell claimed that a mark pronounced "De er" being used by the defendant infringed on a Dell mark, pronounced "Dai er. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:34 am
We’ll keep you posted on the progress of the case. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 7:24 am
MARK STEYN: Our Permanent State of Routine Emergency. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:21 pm
Mark Midei’s medical license was revoked today by the Maryland Board of Physicians. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:52 am
The tribunal essentially ordered the federal body to “cease its discriminatory practices” in its land management practices related to locatees.The case marks the first time that the Canadian Human Rights Act has been applied to the Indian Act and INAC since it was amended in 2008. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 11:02 am
Mark Johnson, 889 F.3d 1120 (9thCir. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 10:06 am
The program gets high marks from both sides. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 3:04 am
And in any case, the advertising material were apparently available only in Peru and therefore had no probative value.Likelihood of Confusion: The Board viewed the design elements of applicant's mark as "insignificant background elements," concluding that "applicant has essentially appropriated registrant's mark GOTT without adding any other distinguishing features." [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:55 am
The Board disagreed, but in any case observed that applicant's mark "merely describe[s] the nineteen crimes themselves under the broadly stated subject matter of Applicant's goods and services. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:07 am
[In this complicated case concerning ownership of the two marks shown immediately below, for restaurant services, the Board sustained Opposer Constantine's oppositions, ruling that applicant was not the owner of the marks at the time the applications were filed, and consequently, both of the opposed applications were void ab initio]. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:18 am
In yet another failure-to-function case, the Board affirmed a refusal to register INTELLIGENCE OF THINGS as a service mark for supply chain management services, custom manufacture of electronics, and engineering services. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 3:02 am
Also some cases included a refusal of the mark over two different registered marks. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
TTABlogger comment: I don't think the case was so cut-and-dried. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
Both patent and trade mark will have unitary effect. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 5:57 am
The hearing in the OMEGA case will be held as part of that ABA-IPL Conference in Bethesda, Maryland (details here). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:31 am
Proof includes collecting information from the accident scene, such as photos of the vehicles, skid marks, debris, and other relevant evidence. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:23 am
Only one judge has been involved in more than one case so far -- Judge Martin, who authored the Maker's Mark decision and is also part of the panel that will decide the MillerCoors case. [read post]
