Search for: "National Health Insurance Company" Results 5321 - 5340 of 6,184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2009, 9:36 pm
December 3, 2009 - 10 AM: In re Capital Blue Cross, Serial No. 78869843 [Section 2(d) refusal to register AVALON for "Issuing group and individual health insurance policies and offering as a licensed insurer such health insurance policies and the administration thereof excluding acting as a broker or insurance agent" in view of the registered marks A AVALON Consulting Insurance/Reinsurance Claims Management, AVALON CONSULTING,… [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm by Priscilla J. Smith
In other words, companies that currently offer plans that cover abortion would only be able to participate in the exchange if they set up a duplicate company within the company to sell a non-abortion coverage plan. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm
But when the bills achieve the exact same outcome by forcing somebody to pay $10,000 directly to a private insurance company, it appears nowhere in the official CBO cost estimates â€" neither as federal revenues nor federal spending. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
Currently, many insurance companies do not cover care by this large section of the health care community which includes massage therapists, naturopathic physicians, acupuncturists, and much more. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
This reminds me of the proposal to let people buy health insurance across state lines. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:43 pm by Michael A. DeMayo
The Charlotte Observer article quoted the executive director of the National Council for Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA) saying that: ‘If healthcare professionals are being asked to not record injuries properly, then we have a pretty broken system. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:37 am
A previous AAJ report on malpractice insurers found they had earnings higher than 99% of Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:22 pm by Jason Greis
The bill would cover 31 million Americans who are currently without insurance, as well as adding new benefits to Medicare and imposing new regulations on insurance companies. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:22 pm by Jason Greis
The bill would cover 31 million Americans who are currently without insurance, as well as adding new benefits to Medicare and imposing new regulations on insurance companies. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 8:07 am by Big Tent Democrat
That means for the next four years, health care will become a partisan football at the state level, easily gamed by the same insurance company lobbyist dollars that flooded on to Capitol Hill this year. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:13 pm
Insurance companies want to make it financially impossible for people to sue them. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 10:24 am by Jim Reed
Despite what insurance companies and doctors may want us to believe, there is NOT a medical malpractice lawsuit "crisis. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:29 am
The former majority leader was President Obama's first pick for secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services before he withdraw in February after a flurry of stories over tax issues. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:22 am
And that tax on health insurance companies? [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 11:19 am by Rick Hills
But the CIO's ability to win concessions on health benefits from big employers during the 1945-46 wave of strikes lulled unions into the complacent belief that they need not lobby hard for national health insurance because they could get the private version through collective bargaining. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:27 am
If a Medicare beneficiary fails to reimburse the agency for health care costs it paid, the agency can punish the insurance company with double damages. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:24 am
As the nation remains mired in a debate over health care reform and how to keep down the costs of expanding coverage, AAJ is trying to point out that Republicans claims that medical malpractice lawsuits are one of the big cost drivers is completely misleading. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:59 pm
Maybe that was the point of this exercise (wonders the cynic), but it certainly does not bode well for similar efforts on a national scale. [read post]