Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 55,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued a long-awaited decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm
Floyd v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 2:52 pm
See Touch of Italy v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
Specifically at issue in the case of Trump v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am
The Court majority in Printz v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 3:14 am
Despite the power of the internet, we are just beginning to regulate it. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Noel Canning v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:01 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals considered several issues with respect to cash-assistance benefits under the Family Independence Program (FIP) in the consolidated appeals of Smith v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm
Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court explored the concept of investigative detention in the landmark case of R. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:09 am
Different powers. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:04 pm
Unfortunately, on Meet the Press this morning, Senator Biden denied that the Congress has such a constitutional power: SEN. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm
His suit challenging the secretary’s decision has already been up to the Supreme Court once – leading to a remarkable 2012 ruling in Salazar v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Court of Appeal decision In R (Bancoult No 2) v Foreign Secretary [2007] EWCA Civ 498, the Court of Appeal held that the Immigration Order was an abuse of power because they permanently excluded an entire population from their homeland for reasons unrelated to the population’s wellbeing. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:24 pm
According to the Supreme Court’s 1915 decision in Burdick v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
Here is the abstract: In Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
