Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 5321 - 5340
of 9,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2007, 10:03 am
Robert M. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 10:21 am
Hunt v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
OBAMA, President of the United States; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and KEITH B. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm
Today the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
In anticipation of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
(GrayLeCozDuan) Robert L. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 8:57 am
United States, is “set in constitutional stone. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:38 am
In its dismissal of Berg's complaint, the trial court relied on a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California interpreting California law. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
Omega, in which an equally divided Court affirmed a Ninth Circuit decision that limited the first-sale doctrine to items made in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:54 am
Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:13 am
Instead, Congress opted simply to express regret for the events of a century before.Brief of United States at 8 (emphasis original). [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am
” At The New Republic, Matt Ford explains that although “Chief Justice John Roberts closed the door” this term on federal courts as a remedy for partisan gerrymandering, his opinion in Rucho v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post (subscription required) that “[u]nder the new policy, immigrants would be suspect if they are in the United States legally and use public benefits — such as Medicaid, food stamps or housing assistance — too often or are deemed likely to someday rely on them. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 10:20 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
http://katzjustice.com Today, the United States Supreme Court substantially retreated from Crawford v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm
United States, a co-defendant’s guilty plea has been deemed inadmissible against the defendant. [read post]
