Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF S M"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 33,803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2009, 11:15 am
Dunlap Jr & Associates LLC stated that, "My phone has been ringing off the hook since the announcement of the SEC's action. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am
And those States have non-compete laws that are interesting and nuanced.But E.T. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:23 am
” Also writing in the same issue of Forbes, Brian Wingfield further divines “How the Tax Compromise Might Affect Estate Planning,” There’s no interest like self-interest. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:32 am
States have apparently already begun to register their interest in participating in a new Group—even before the General Assembly has considered this question. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 1:42 pm
Jordan (Jurisdiction, Professional Misconduct) Rosalind M. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
The best I can do is to suggest the possibility that there's some non-textualized constitutional definition of "state" (enforceable by the courts rather than by Congress in deciding which states to admit), and that DC's neighborhoods don't satisfy that definition. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:00 am
This means that the seller’s name no longer appears on the loan, and is replaced by the buyer’s. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
(1 & 2(a)(i))) You have caused harm to Pat, by causing damage to Pat’s reputation (and perhaps business interests), and possibly also emotional injury. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
(summary judgment in favor of parties), the district court found that a state statute governing certain hospital mergers constituted state action that exempted the merger from federal antitrust review. [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:25 pm
Although one suspects that this is intended at least in part as a publicity stunt, the complaint actually seems to me to state a credible claim. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:01 pm
"It seeks this declaration having been informed ... that the United States government engages in pervasive surveillance of electronically transmitted data. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 5:46 am
Curtis' teaching interests are primarily in the fields of Constitutional, Family, and Privacy Law. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:56 pm
" I'm glad the State Bar is seeking to do something about this. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The Law Library Reading Room’s collection of United States Reports. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
I'm much less interested in what California will say, as the anti-anti-steering injunction was merely Epic's consolation prize while the strategically important battle here is over Epic's claims under federal antitrust law (Sherman Act).DOJ officials attended every single day of the spring 2021 trial, and the DOJ is rumored to be preparing its own United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 11:20 pm
In response to Paul's interesting post on the distinctive characteristics of universities, I'd like to register a vote for their non-distinctiveness. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:07 am
For example, a situation in which there is domestic violence, or substance abuse can have a profound effect on children and be important when addressing the children’s best interests. [read post]
