Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 5321 - 5340 of 21,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Sentencing Law and Policy Blog, Wayne Logan discusses Gundy v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:29 pm by Arina Shulga
  To be precise: (i) TokenLot advertised and sold tokens issued by others; (ii) solicited investors; (iii) processed funds; (iv) enabled secondary trading in those tokens; and (v) advertised and promoted the sale of tokens in exchange for marketing fees paid by token issuers. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
Some argue that even a sale of art works at an auction in a safe third state after emigrating to that state constitutes a forced sale due to the causal link between persecution, emigration and sale for making money in the exile. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
Until recently, the law had been settled that any sale (within the United States) of a product that included claimed features of an invention is prior art, even if the sale did not publicly disclose those claimed features. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 1:33 pm by Daniel Nathan
” The SEC found that notwithstanding “[t]he lack of monetary consideration for purportedly ‘free’ shares,” the issuance of the TOM tokens as a “gift” of a security through the Bounty Program constituted a “sale” or “offer to sell” within the meaning of the Securities Act as stated in SEC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 1:46 am by Florian Mueller
Moreover, FTC rules of practice state that the FTC 'expects all parties to engage in meaningful discussions with staff.' [...] [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:11 am by John Jascob
The amici argued that the lower court’s failure to consider relevant precedents would subvert the North Carolina legislature’s intent to safeguard the integrity of North Carolina’s securities markets for out-of-state and North Carolina investors (NNN Durham Office Portfolio 1, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 8:27 am by Joy Waltemath
In addition to recommending denying both parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on the bartender’s FLSA claim, a federal magistrate judge in Florida also recommended allowing the bartender’s state-law claim for lost wages to advance to trial (Alban v. 2K Clevelander LLC, August 28, 2018, Louis, L.). [read post]