Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 13,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 1:50 pm
The last time I recall this occurring was in 2005 when the United States Supreme Court held in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
In Unum Group v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
And that decision's from no schlub of a court: it's from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 8:48 am
In the recent case, San Joaquin County Correctional Officers Association v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 8:42 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm
Similarly, in the United States, a recent decision from the California Employment Development Department, found an Uber driver to be an employee for purposes of eligibility for unemployment law. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
At 4, he immigrated to the United States as a U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
Sprint Corporation, a Sprint Communications Company, L.P., et al., No. 2:14-cv- 02461-TLN-AC, pending before the Honorable Troy Nunley in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “Action”) Quintilone & Associates and a team of lawyer successfully reached a settlement of claims that Sprint violated various provisions of California’s wage and hour laws by, among other things, allegedly failing to: provide… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:56 pm
Henderson, of the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 1:07 pm
The court also agreed to take on another case involving the scope of jurisdiction over companies that do business throughout the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Over at PATENTLYO, Dennis Crouch blogs about the non-precedential decision In re Chudik, issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which involved whether a functional limitation contained in a claim can be found in the prior art. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am
United States and whether Section 16(b) is void for vagueness. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
By Little V. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 1:54 pm
The FTC has filed the following complaint with the the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (this post continues below the document): 17-01-17 FTC Complaint v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
When not coaching the Cavaliers, Heikkinen divided his time between his legal studies and his involvement with the University of Virginia’s Flight Preparatory School which was established as part of the United States Navy’s V-12 program during the Second World War. [read post]
