Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 18,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2010, 8:14 am
We now have two different panels of the Indiana Court of Appeals agreeing that a trial court must consider the child custody modification criteria listed under the relocation statutes (Indiana Code 31-17-2.2-1 through -6) as well those under the child custody statute when dealing with a relocation/modification case.Wolljung v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 3:00 am
According to SCOTUS Blog, the United States Supreme Court has ordered supplemental briefing in Kennedy v Louisiana, Supreme Court No. 07-343. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 7:47 pm
In Rivas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:09 am
In Gandhi v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:09 am
He used his real name but lied by understating his age so as to be considered a child when he claimed asylum. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:28 am
Take for example the case of Reagins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:30 am
In 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States limited third-party (often grandparent) visitation rights in Troxel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:52 am
Like Sifuentes v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:14 am
") AC33831 - State v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 4:00 pm
â [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 12:10 pm
Marion County Department of Child Services (NFP) NFP criminal opinions today (9): Myron Larry v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:56 am
United States (Fee to Trust)Bowman v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:13 am
Extended Border Search Doctrine: Suspicionless Searches of Computers and Cameras Need not be Conducted at Time and Place of Entry By: Houston Criminal Lawyer John Floyd and Paralegal Billy Sinclair It was a case of “first impression” for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals—the case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 7:08 am
This week at the CCAs: On Wednesday, ACCA hears oral argument in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, the United States Supreme Court decided Fernandez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 8:42 am
” “the Plaintiff’s view that Fenix should be liable for Romelus’s content merely because Fenix’s rules are ineffective or inconsistently enforced has been repeatedly rejected” “Unlike our case, the defendant in MG Freesites allegedly accessed, reviewed, and approved every video on its website containing child pornography and actively helped child pornographers hide their content from law enforcement. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:10 am
Last week, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the United States District Court of Nebraska's previous ruling in US v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:17 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral arguments in Mayorkas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 7:44 am
To read the entire decision, Roodvoets v Royce, click here. [read post]
