Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 5321 - 5340 of 8,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2019, 10:23 am by Florian Mueller
I'm typing this while Fish & Richardson's Ruffin Cordell is still delivering Apple's opening statement in the Apple v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:46 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The USPTO has announced new procedures patent holders can follow to obtain additional Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) under the Federal Circuit’s January 2019 decision in Supernus Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 8:27 pm
 On Afro-IP, Caroline NCube's series on African states' IP policy takes her alphabetically from Cameroon to Comoros. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:32 am
New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Dev. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Wade will be repealed (with abortion still possibly legal on a state-by-state basis) but whether the Court would invent a doctrine under which abortion would be constitutionally prohibited nationwide.Beyond abortion, I asked whether even Griswold v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:32 am
However, a new found harmony between the two has been signaled, at least by the US Government, in Golan v Holder. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
Patent holder’s grant of right to license patent didn’t deprive it of standing to sue for infringement. 22-2207.OPINION.5-1-2024_2310958.pdf (uscourts.gov) Infringement judgment didn’t become final before unpatentability decision did. 22-2064.OPINION.5-2-2024_2311705.pdf (uscourts.gov) Patent holder’s effort to stop Utah company from making sales that holder claimed infringed its patent made it subject to personal jurisdiction in Utah.… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 11:43 pm by Michael Geist
For example, in CCH the Supreme Court of Canada stated: The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user’s right. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
 European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]