Search for: "State v. So " Results 5321 - 5340 of 116,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2009, 11:42 am
Dempsey, 899 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Sanchez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am by Frank Cranmer
It was prepared to assume that Article 14 was engaged in conjunction with Article 8, but that, even so, the difference in treatment was objectively and reasonably justified in the circumstances of the case [41]. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
5 May 2006, 7:32 am
The exception was articulated in the 1946 Supreme Court opinion in Markham v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm by Orin Kerr
So according to the state, the exclusionary rule should not apply. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am by ELLIOT GOLD
One can perhaps now understand why the judgment took so long – almost a year – to be released. [read post]