Search for: "State v. Whited" Results 5321 - 5340 of 13,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am by Tara Hofbauer
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:12 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeCourt Denies Sentence Clarification; No Intention To Adjust Sentence on Unrelated State Conviction United States v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm by Walsh & Walsh, P.C.
White Rose Food (2nd Cir. 2001) 237 F.3d 174, reversing a bench decision in favor of the employee in a § 301 case; Leventhal v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Flores (08-294), on state power to control English language instruction (cases consolidated for one-hour argument) On Tuesday, the Court may release the opinion in one or more pending cases. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:37 am by Walter Olson
Levine (20) Wisconsin’s “Vanna White veto” (0) Wisconsin Supreme Court follies: Heikkinen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm by Cyrus Farivar
In the Thursday filing to Judge Jeffrey White, the EFF also said that it wants the United States government to “disclose the steps it has taken to preserve evidence and to disclose whether it has destroyed telephone records, Internet metadata records, Internet or telephone content data, or any other evidence potentially relevant to these lawsuits. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by David Russcol
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by David Russcol
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]