Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California" Results 5321 - 5340 of 11,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm by Deborah Rosenthal
In California, state law already generally allows applicants to accept a permit and still challenge illegal conditions under Nollan-Dolan, but many states saw the granting of the permit as barring a later challenge. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 6:45 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, a recent ruling in the United States District Court Central District of California found that remastering a song qualifies it for a new copyright. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:17 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Interestingly, the Choice of Law Clause is generally binding regardless of the state in which the Court hearing the dispute is sitting. [read post]
26 May 2014, 6:35 am by Walter Olson
Tweet Tags: attorneys general, California, Colorado, constitutional law, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Mikal Watts, politics, Sheldon Silver, State Farm, state high courts, Tenth CircuitPolitics roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:46 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
Interestingly, the Choice of Law Clause is generally binding regardless of the state in which the Court hearing the dispute is sitting. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:46 pm by Amy Howe
The South Bay United Pentecostal Church had argued that the reopening plan created by California Gov. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
McBurney, a former Virginian who now lives in California, and by Roger W. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  It seems likely that Morgan Drexen will ask the California federal court for a stay of proceedings pending a ruling by the Washington, D.C. [read post]
26 May 2011, 11:11 am
Applying the Act in a manner consistent with provisions in express trusts, the anti-anticipation clause bars any attempt to pay or commit for payment benefits before they become due. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:14 am by Eric Goldman
California and federal courts agree that actions that, like the instant case, seek relief based on an internet service provider’s decisions whether to publish, edit, or withdraw particular postings are barred by Section 230. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 11:39 am
Kremer argued that the First Amendment protects his registration and use of bosleymedical.com, and bars application of state trademark law in the action. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 1:13 am by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
On the merits, the district court examined the California Supreme Court’s rationale in McGill. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:35 am by Eric Bangeman
In an opinion released Wednesday, the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act does not bar lawsuits based on individual state privacy laws. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by Tucker Chambers
The Ninth Circuit concluded that California’s analogous four-year statute of limitations for trademark infringement actions applied. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 4:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
A California statute bars private employers from firing employees for their "political activity. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:47 am by Colleen Regan
Time will tell what else the California lawmakers and courts will dream up for 2016. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Alabama bars consumer class actions under the ADTPA, but that procedural rule is only applicable in state court, not in federal courts governed by Rule 23; Alabama also allows the AG to bring classwide claims. [read post]