Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 8,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2013, 11:38 am
Once deemed lawfully detained, the petitioners could be beaten, tortured, humiliated, prevented from observing the tenets of their faith, and deprived of medical care, all at the unfettered discretion of a single person—the President of the United States. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
We cannot help but mention that now the "science" behind Accutane IBD claims has been held to be inadequate in both United States federal courts and Canada, leaving one judge in New Jersey as the outlier. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:04 pm
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him", held that "the Sixth Amendment's right of an accused to confront the witnesses against him is a fundamental right and is made obligatory on the States by the Fourteenth Amendment." [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
However, on May 23, 2013, the Delta Protection Commission, a state agency made of primarily of local governmental officials from throughout the five-county Delta region, voted to oppose the BDCP on the ground that the plan is not supportive of the Delta. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In November, 2008 the respondent moved by herself to the United States and into the Kakwani family home. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed and held that the Florida Supreme Court erred on both grounds. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 4:15 am
Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution provides that "[t]he President shall be the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States ... " It would seem to follow, therefore, that the President of the United States, as Commander-in-Chief, has the authority-- and power-- to directly address the issue of force-feeding of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay.AP reports on the decision. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
Windsor filed suit against the United States in the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm
Windsor filed suit against the United States in the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 12:49 pm
” It would seem to follow, therefore, that the President of the United States, as Commander-in-Chief, has the authority — and power — to directly address the issue of force-feeding of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:44 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
. ____ (2013) and the ways in which, for me, sheds light on a reality of the structure of international human rights and business that may be belied by the torrent of lofty language churning out of elite state and non-state actors. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:50 pm
The court ordered the United States to respond almost immediately, and earlier today, it timely filed its opposition brief. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
Roughly two and a half months later the United States Supreme Court in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:22 am
She was born and raised in China, but was naturalized in the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:52 am
Nahshin became the owner of the mark in the United States through the distribution of the product.From 2003 to 2007, Respondent purchased Petitioner's NIC-OUT product from Maslov and distributed the product for him. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
This recent term of the Supreme Court of the United States opened the door to new and welcome discussions of federalism. [read post]
