Search for: "UNited States v. White" Results 5321 - 5340 of 7,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Even w/pressure from White House, they uniformly decided not to take it down. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1094 n.14 (8th Cir. 1973) (likewise); Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 1043-45 (4th ed. 2011); Laurence Tribe, Constitutional Law, § 12-17, at 926; Toni M. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
, 58 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 69 (2023) The events of January 6th 2021, and the era of emboldened armed white supremacist violence that surrounded the United States Capitol attack spurred state commitment to counter “white supremacist terrorism. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Ct. 436 (U.S. 2003); Whiting v Krassner, 391 F3d 540 (3rd Cir, 2004); Application of Adan, 437 F.3d 381 (3rd Cir. 2006). [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am by Brett Holubeck
Moreover, the success of these proposals will depend on the final composition of the House and Senate (in addition to who controls the White House). 6. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
Look at what happened to her: she was sent to jail for obeying her religious duty (because she is a Christian, and not just because she swore on a Bible) to honor the oath she swore (“so help me God”), on taking office, to uphold both the Kentucky and the United States Constitutions. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Kathleen Claussen
  Second, Congress should prohibit the executive branch from relying on an international agreement it has negotiated as the legal basis under which any good or service is imported into the United States, exported from the United States, or regulated while in the United States, unless Congress has either explicitly authorized the agreement in advance or approved it after its conclusion. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs subsequently appealed from the district court's order granting the United States' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
A majority of mainstream art museum collections remain white and male with 85% of represented artists being white and 87% male.[24] This point about museums acting more like clubs can be further illustrated when looking at how museum donors are also the ones who use the museum. [read post]