Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 51,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2009, 3:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Blues Destiny Records LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:07 am
Pietrantoni 1 Given the likelihood of a Title III proceeding under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and certain of its instrumentalities in the near future,2 we thought it useful to outline some, but by no means all, of the key issues that are likely to be raised. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm
Google’s First Amendment claim has a straightforward component based on a 1999 case, Ford v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:43 am
IOEngine, LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 7:57 am
Given the high costs and uncertainties involved in the drug-development process, patents provide a core support to maintain the pharmaceutical industry’s business model. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
" As Alito notes, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 1:41 pm
Not in Farrey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 8:35 pm
If so, what were the precise undertakings of confidentiality given by the individual who created the record, to whom were they given, when, why and in what form? [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 12:25 pm
Importantly, the administrative employee must use discretion and independent judgment when working. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Williams v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a lethal injection drug protocol in Baze v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:02 pm
USA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
Given the options employees here were given, this part was not met. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:13 am
May a definition or similar information on a term used in the claims which is explicitly given in the description be disregarded when interpreting the claims to assess patentability and, if so, under what conditions? [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 2:37 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
