Search for: "United States v. New York"
Results 5321 - 5340
of 16,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
Asher Susser contended that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often explained using a selective account of events and facts and specifically took on two recent articles in the New York Review of Books. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm
The charges include conspiracy to defraud the United States, wire fraud and bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 3:14 pm
The insureds, Platinum Management (NY) LLC and its various officers and directors (the “Insureds”), were the subject of a criminal prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a civil enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission in the same court, and a parallel civil action in Texas state court. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
The letter states: As Attorney General of the United States, I have a duty to defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the laws passed by Congress. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 1:11 pm
Nielsen and New York v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:36 am
Shulga is the co-founder of Ross & Shulga PLLC, a New York-based boutique law firm specializing in advising individual and corporate clients on aspects of corporate and securities law. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:29 am
Forrest in a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 3:01 am
Belmora says that one need not own a trademark in the United States to bring a Section 43(a) claim (Bayer owned the mark FLANAX in Mexico). [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
’ The decedent bequeathed to Irene, in the event that she survived him, all of his automobiles, his interest in a condominium apartment in Vero Beach, Florida, subject to any outstanding mortgage and all of its contents, his condominium in Somers, New York, and all of its contents and the contents of their storage unit. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In 2016, New York City passed the first menstrual equity law for women prisoners, and this year similar bills are pending in Maryland, Colorado, Hawaii, Virginia, Wisconsin and the United States Senate.As long as women’s menstrual needs are considered a privilege and not a right, and they can be taken away on a whim or used to coerce or humiliate women, the degradation and abuse will continue in prisons, jails, and juvenile detention centers nationwide. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak goes on tour with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who “is set to make at least nine public appearances” “[i]n the space of three weeks. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 3:56 am
Therefore, applying any of the above tests, the failure to consider a defendant’s financial situation when imposing bail violates that defendant’s right to equal protection under the United States and New York State Constitutions. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 12:04 pm
United States (2011) for the proposition that claims based on structural provisions of the Constitution are justiciable. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm
Matthew Kahn posted the New York Times’ filing made with the FISC requesting the release of the applications and orders sanctioning the surveillance of Page. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “[t]he justices seemed to split into three camps. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 8:30 am
DOJ has not affirmatively argued this position, but in a letter to the Southern District of New York, DOJ lawyers stated that "[t]he Government has not conceded that the President is subject to the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
