Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 5321 - 5340 of 24,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am by Joel R. Brandes
On September 13, the court received a letter from Bertha stating that she would be staying in the United States indefinitely with Z.F.M.Z. [read post]
14 May 2014, 9:27 am by Gene Killian
Let’s review an Illinois case from a few years back, United Stationers Supply Co v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:38 am
Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office):"Today's ruling enjoining the PTO from implementing its controversial rules on continuations and claims is a sound decision that reflects the concerns we expressed in our amicus brief. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm by Orin Kerr
The Fourth Circuit had a recent case that raised similar issues, United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:01 pm by Heidi Meinzer
Van Dusen and the IRS worked out some matters, but the issue over the Fix Our Ferals deduction went to trial in the United States Tax Court. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
The court supported this argument with a citation to United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]